Skip to content
The rise of new AI-powered features from Google-especially AI Overviews and AI Mode-marks a dramatic shift in how people get information online. What used to rely heavily on “blue links” in search results is gradually being replaced by chatbots and summary-style answers. For many news outlets, that shift is taking a heavy toll.
What Are These Tools?
Two main Google innovations are changing the game:
- AI Overviews
These are summaries that appear at the top of Google search results. They attempt to distil content (from multiple sources) into an immediately readable answer or overview—often replacing part of what users would get by clicking through several links. - AI Mode
This is more of a conversational, chatbot‐style interface. Rather than showing many search results, it is built to directly respond to user queries. Fewer links, more direct answers. It competes with non‐Google chatbots like ChatGPT.
Together, these tools create a “zero‐click” environment: users get what they need without clicking through to external websites.
The Impact on News Publishers
The effects on traffic and revenue are already visible, and significant.
- Big drops in organic search traffic
Some major news publishers have seen traffic from Google searches drop sharply. Business Insider, for example, saw a ~55% decline in organic search traffic from April 2022 to April 2025. HuffPost, Washington Post, The New York Times—all have felt major dips. - Fewer clicks, more summarization above the fold
Because AI Overviews often provide the summary that users want right on the search page, fewer people need to click through to read full articles. That’s cutting off a vital source of traffic for news sites. - Editorial and operational strain
As referrals decline, ad revenue and subscription prospects are under pressure. Some publishers are laying off staff; others are revising their strategies for content, distribution, and monetization. - Uneven effects
Not all publishers are equally affected. Larger, well‐trusted outlets tend to keep more visibility even when AI Overviews are used; smaller or niche publishers lose out more. Also, pages like product reviews, health tips, guides—things that often rely heavily on search traffic—are especially hit. - Change in the share of traffic
Even for outlets that haven’t lost absolute traffic in some cases, the proportion of their traffic coming via organic search from Google is dropping. Trust and direct visits become more important.
Why This Matters: The Stakes for Journalism
These shifts aren’t just about numbers. They affect the health of journalism, public information access, and media ecosystems.
- Economic model under pressure
Many news outlets depend on traffic from search engines to drive ad impressions, subscriptions, and visibility. As that diminishes, the funds available for investigative reporting, fact‐checking, staff salaries, etc., shrink. - Risk of information concentration
If the same few big outlets or platforms get more exposure (because AI leans on established sources), smaller or independent voices may struggle to be heard. - Quality versus speed trade‐offs
Summaries can be useful, but they may omit nuance, context, or critical detail. They also risk mistakes (hallucinations) or bias. If users rely too much on short AI‐generated answers, they may miss complexity. - Copyright, licensing, and fairness
There’s growing debate and legal action over whether Google and other AI firms should pay for content they use (directly or indirectly), especially when that content is serving as the basis for AI summaries. Publishers argue this usage should be compensated. - Changing user behaviour
As users grow accustomed to getting answers without clicking through, their habits change. That leads to persistent shifts in traffic sources and expectations—something that takes time to reverse.
How Publishers Are Responding
Faced with this disruption, news publishers and media organizations are exploring several strategies:
- Evolving business models
Moving more toward subscriptions, memberships, “direct to audience” relationships—so not relying as much on search referrals. - Licensing and deals with AI / tech firms
Some publishers are licensing content to AI platforms, hoping for revenue from that rather than only from clicks. - Legal / regulatory push
Lawsuits or regulatory pressure are being discussed or taken by publishers who feel their content is being used without proper compensation. - Diversifying content formats & audiences
More focus on types of content less vulnerable to zero-click answers—exclusive reporting, audio/video, specialized content; also exploring non‐search discoverability (social, newsletters, offline events). - Optimizing for AI summarization
Some publishers are trying to make sure their content is “AI‐friendly” in ways that increase the likelihood of being correctly represented or included, but this is tricky: what is “AI friendly” may not always align with what’s best editorially.
What Google Says & Its Role
Google has defended its moves, arguing that:
- These tools improve user experience by delivering fast answers.
- For many queries—especially utility, trending non‐news, or frequently asked questions—the overviews and AI Mode may satisfy user intent without requiring a click.
- It claims that people who do click through after AI Overviews spend more time on sites, which might help with engagement.
Still, “better experience” from a user standpoint doesn’t necessarily translate to sustainability for publishers. And Google’s design choices (how much info to show, when to include links, how summaries are formed) are central to how strongly the effect is felt.
What the Future Might Hold
Thinking ahead, several scenarios seem likely:
- Increased regulation around AI usage of copyrighted content; possibly requirements for compensation or transparency for AI summaries.
- More partnerships/licensing agreements between publishers and AI companies. Think of models where publishers are paid for content that is used in AI summaries.
- Shift in SEO / traffic acquisition strategies toward more emphasis on direct traffic, email/newsletter subscriptions, social media, and possibly localized content.
- Higher importance for trust, fact-checking, depth. In a world of fast AI summaries, outlets that can maintain accuracy, credibility, and depth may gain a competitive advantage.
- User awareness & behavior change. If users feel that AI summaries often omit context or are biased, they may revert to more conservative behaviour—clicking through, cross-checking—and this could influence design of these tools.
- New monetization models: sponsorships, micropayments, paywalls with flexible access, or even incentives from platforms that use publisher content.
Conclusion
The introduction of Google New AI Tools—particularly AI Overviews and AI Mode—is reshaping how people search and find news. For news publishers, the change is not just gradual, but deeply disruptive: less traffic, lower ad revenue, changing content value, and an urgent need to adapt.
The stakes are high: the survival of many media organizations may depend on how well they can innovate, protect their content, and find new ways to reach audiences. Journalism in the AI era will look different—not necessarily worse, but certainly transformed.
